Re: Am I the only one who genuinely enjoys sexism in Anime?
abc123youandme said:
You managed to completely miss the point. Princess is little more than a title. No gender roles and responsibilities of a prince and princess don't have to be followed, but girls are still referred to as Princesses. And guys are still referred to as Princes. You're finding sexism where it's not at.
First and foremost, your second sentence is grammatically incorrect. Secondly, if you watched Utena, you would know that she wanted to and was able to take on not only the role and responsibilities of a prince, but also the image of one despite being female. Besides, as ridiculous as it might sound to some of you, I DO think man would have the right to be unhappy with not being able to take on the title and role of being a princess if he wants to. Although a prince wouldn't necessarily have to follow all the gender rules and responsibilities, he more likely than not would still be unable to wear a dress.
abc123youandme said:
Marriage and a titular are two remotely completely different things. While on the subject if a civil union has all the same benefits as a marriage, does it really matter what it's called? I'm not saying that they do, but if you want to use this analogy Tuxedo Mask has a transformation sequence (albeit only used once )like a Senshi, he has powers like a Senshi (even more so in the manga) , he has a planet like a senshi, he has a star seed like a Senshi.
First of all, I completely disagree with your first statement, as marriage in itself is a title couples take. Second, yes I do think it would still matter what a marriage / civil union would be called even if they granted equal benefits. The LGBT community shouldn't have to settle for a different title for their civil ceremony, as there is a clear separation between church and state. Thirdly, to get back on the topic of SM, even though Tuxedo Mask did indeed possess some of those similarities you mentioned to a sailor senshi, there was still enough differences to differentiate the two and not make them equal. In contrast, sailor senshi use wands and brooches to transform, have a tiara, and wore the completely different outfit of a sailor suit to a tuxedo. Plus like I mentioned earlier, Tuxedo Mask did not possess any magical powers in the anime, which put him at a huge disadvantage imo. Plus, even if he was just as strong as Sailor Moon, I still wouldn't be satisfied because I always preferred the idea of wearing a sailor outfit than a tuxedo while fighting bad guys.
abc123youandme said:
Kero does take that into account. Notice she said the intended target demographic. Just because Sailor Moon like many other works of fiction has an audience that overlaps from its target audience, doesn't mean it doesn't have a target audience. Sailor Moon was marketed and targeted toward girls. That doesn't mean guys can't watch them. Again you're crying SEXISM when none is there, at least on Kero's part. Also this:
Is just as bad as what you're accusing Kero and the show of. Implying that the only males who watch the show are gay.
No you're missing the point. Girls don't get as much representation in the super hero genre as guys do. So it's nice for girls to have have female characters to respond to. It doesn't mean they have to watch it or that they can't watch stuff with a boy target demographic in mind and prefer that. It's representation. It's why shows that started using black main characters got praise, and why the media is praising shows like Glee and Ugly Betty now for gay representation. When Sailor Moon came out girls really only had Wonder Woman (who never had a solo series outside of the comics) and She-Ra, who was a female counterpart to a male hero. Xena also came out the same year that Sailor Moon was brought over to North America.
1. If you clearly read her post, she actually did not take that part of the fanbase into account. The only male demographic she refereed to were adult males.
2. Your second statement in that set of three is completely bogus and drawn from thin air. First of all, because like I mentioned in my point #1, Kero's statement clearly only talked about "adult males" being able to like Sailor Moon despite it's target audience. She didn't take into account sexual orientation, or the age those fans started watching the show.Secondly, because in my post I mentioned "Gay male PART" of the fanbase. A part certainly doesn't make a whole, so I was in no way shape or form implying all of Sailor Moon's male fans are Gay.
3. I actually agree with you that yes, it is indeed nice for girls to have positive super heroine role models to look up to growing up. However, turning this round full circle what I take issue with is Naoko's whole idea that ONLY girls can be sailor senshi. I don't like or support an idea such as that because I don't feel the sex a person is born should restrict or hold anyone back from being the person, or in this case kind of super hero they want to be. I would be just as upset and unsupportive of someone who tried to come up with a rule banning girls from being something only boys could be. Like say, from being a super hero at all.
P.S. Kero, as I clearly dissected and debated each and every one of your arguments, it clearly shows I did take the time to read your thoughts. I simply just did not come to agree with or support your point of view.