I rewatched Cosmos today... and it got worse

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.
Apr 19, 2024
228
668
665
34
#1
The "Cosmos Announced thread..." seems to be focused on the debacle of international dubs, but rewatching Cosmos again, after having watched it in Japanese last December, I couldn't help but think the ludicrous imposition of honorifics and English terms is just the tip of the iceberg.

First of all, let me start by saying that I did enjoy Cosmos more than the Stars Arc in the Manga (even though I'll admit the bar wasn't very high). At least in Cosmos I was able to tell what the heck was going on in the action scenes and, especially in the second film, keep track of how and when Moon & Co. were hopping from one place to another. The tiny bits added as a Starlights sendoff and seeing Luna again were also nice additions. But still I couldn't help but be sad at what a lame film it is and be baffled thinking at some of the comments I'd read earlier saying how happy they were to finally have an adaptation that "makes this glorious Arc justice" Stars Arc.

When I first read the manga, I was amazed at how the arc managed to feel dizzingly rushed and plod clumsily at the same time, and now I think I understand why. After the Inner and the Outer Senshi are dead, there's this long chunk where the plot simply drags and nothing of consequence happens. Let's be honest, do the fights against Lethe and Mnemosyne, Phi and Chi and Heavy Metal Papillion serve any purpose whatsoever other than to padding out the narrative? By then, we already know that Galaxia was jumping from one planet to the next recruiting her minions (and destroying their planets), we know important Usagi's relationships are for her, we've seen the Star Seeds and how the Animamates are trying to collect them for Galaxia, yada yada yada... why couldn't Usagi and the others just fly directly to Galaxia's base of operations? Have Chibi Usa and the Asteroid Senshi escort Sailor Moon to Galaxia while Kakyuu and the Starlights are killed by the evil Senshi or whatever, but couldn't we spend our time on characters that actually meant anything?! And people complain about SuperS spending too much time on "random strangers we don't care about and won't ever see again".

On the other hand, everything happens so fast, there's barely enough time to digest what happen, so the movies won't lose an opportunity to hammer home how cruelly the Senshi were killed and how sad and desperate Usagi is. How many times are we shown the shot of Mamoru turning into dust, again? And why do we have to be shown shots of each Senshi whenever Usagi is reminiscing about how important her friends were? Given how little screentime the Senshi have, was the staff worried we wouldn't remember who Usagi's friends were? And now that I mentioned the reminiscing... just how much exposition can we stand within two and a half hours? I felt a bit bored of character talking about what happened and what was going to happen, instead of properly interacting with each other (again, this was particularly annoying in the second half).

Then, there's obviously the rest... I try to see Cosmos as a more mature and "no nonsense" story, but there's no way I can keep a straight face when Guardian Pluto (and, later, Guardian Cosmos) come up. I remember how anime Stars failed the Inner Senshi multiple times, but here Sailor Venus doesn't even attack until she's dead and controlled by Galaxia. And the list, just like the beat, goes on...

Every now and again, someone comes up and claim most of us who aren't fond of Crystal are just too blinded by our nostalgia, and now and again I've seen comments on social media of people saying they're crying their hearts out, that they felt the movie was incredibly emotional and so on and so forth, and I'm still bemused. It's not like I thoroughly hated the films, mostly because I've loved these characters for so long and seeing Chibi Usa say goodbye to Usagi, for example, does make me emotional. But I feel any sort of enjoyment I had was almost despite, instead of because, what the films themselves were. I can still kind of look past the films and see some nice ideas, thoughtful messages and good intentions, but I'm not watching ideas, messages, and intentions, I'm watching two films, and taking them for what they are. If nostalgia is that big a factor, I'm left with the impression that, if it wasn't for nostalgia, no one would enjoy these films at all.
 

Lady Pen

Aurorae Lunares
Mar 12, 2021
1,584
5,423
1,665
#2
Let's be honest, do the fights against Lethe and Mnemosyne, Phi and Chi and Heavy Metal Papillion serve any purpose whatsoever other than to padding out the narrative?
Filler. But since that filler was created by the most esteemed Naoko Takeuchi, a lot of people are willing to overlook it.

On the other hand, everything happens so fast, there's barely enough time to digest what happen, so the movies won't lose an opportunity to hammer home how cruelly the Senshi were killed and how sad and desperate Usagi is. How many times are we shown the shot of Mamoru turning into dust, again? And why do we have to be shown shots of each Senshi whenever Usagi is reminiscing about how important her friends were? Given how little screentime the Senshi have, was the staff worried we wouldn't remember who Usagi's friends were? And now that I mentioned the reminiscing... just how much exposition can we stand within two and a half hours? I felt a bit bored of character talking about what happened and what was going to happen, instead of properly interacting with each other (again, this was particularly annoying in the second half).
One of the things I couldn't stand about these films is how they keep showing flashbacks of scenes that happened just two minutes ago. Just another reason to keep thinking Naoko Takeuchi is a terrible supervisor for animation projects.
 
Apr 19, 2024
228
668
665
34
#3
One of the things I couldn't stand about these films is how they keep showing flashbacks of scenes that happened just two minutes ago. Just another reason to keep thinking Naoko Takeuchi is a terrible supervisor for animation projects.
Yes, I mean... if they're going to be showing flashbacks, couldn't they just make the scenes last even a little longer so they don't have to keep reminding us of what has just happened?
 

Talentless Fool

Aurorae Lunares
Jan 23, 2023
1,449
6,144
1,665
#4
There's another thing I noticed when rewatching Cosmos' speech.

She does her henshin, poses, kisses Usagi (because of course even Naoko/UsaMe's Not-Alternative future self has to fall in love with her) and makes a big speech and... DOES NOTHING!

She literally disappears from the scene!
Nothing! Cosmos and Chaos say nothing to each other, no determination from her, no last show of her 'outstanding' powers - nada!
The scene immediately jumps to Usagi being possessed by her 90s anime self and being compassionate towards the big bad instead of being a merciless tyrant.

The scene could have easily been rewritten by Cosmos explaining her origins while revealing Chaos' intentions/discussing with it and she disappearing while supporting Usagi or something like that - no need for the Amazoness Bad-Haircut groupie.

Hey at least in the 90s anime, Chibi Chibi is DEAD even though she is super-powered!

The fact that people think this is superior in ANY POINT to the 90s anime's final 6 episodes is bonkers!

Good Lord, I do not have the strength to rewatch these movies but I have the feeling that I would find plotholes and bad writing every 2 mins.
Even divine level imagination wouldn't help save these movies' plot!

Great story telling, my foot!
 

kasumigenx

Systema Solare
Feb 8, 2021
5,388
2,834
1,665
36
www.deviantart.com
#5
The scene could have easily been rewritten by Cosmos explaining her origins while revealing Chaos' intentions/discussing with it and she disappearing while supporting Usagi or something like that - no need for the Amazoness Bad-Haircut groupie.

Hey at least in the 90s anime, Chibi Chibi is DEAD even though she is super-powered!

The fact that people think this is superior in ANY POINT to the 90s anime's final 6 episodes is bonkers!

Good Lord, I do not have the strength to rewatch these movies but I have the feeling that I would find plotholes and bad writing every 2 mins.
Even divine level imagination wouldn't help save these movies' plot!
Considering at what headspace Naoko is, it is indeed bad and she did not consider her fans while writing and drawing it.
 

Lady Pen

Aurorae Lunares
Mar 12, 2021
1,584
5,423
1,665
#6
There's another thing I noticed when rewatching Cosmos' speech.

She does her henshin, poses, kisses Usagi (because of course even Naoko/UsaMe's Not-Alternative future self has to fall in love with her) and makes a big speech and... DOES NOTHING!

She literally disappears from the scene!
Nothing! Cosmos and Chaos say nothing to each other, no determination from her, no last show of her 'outstanding' powers - nada!
XD I hope people start realising that now the films are out there officially.

The scene immediately jumps to Usagi being possessed by her 90s anime self and being compassionate towards the big bad instead of being a merciless tyrant.
And you know some people still think Naoko was NEVER influenced by the 90's anime. P-:

The fact that people think this is superior in ANY POINT to the 90s anime's final 6 episodes is bonkers!
Talentless, you don't understand!!!!!!!!!!!!! In those 6 episodes the Senshis has to fight in a TV station instead of that grandiose river, cemetery, garden, cathedral, and the Cauldron. Aesthetics and concepts always better than storytelling, you know...
 
Apr 19, 2024
228
668
665
34
#7
There's another thing I noticed when rewatching Cosmos' speech.

She does her henshin, poses, kisses Usagi (because of course even Naoko/UsaMe's Not-Alternative future self has to fall in love with her) and makes a big speech and... DOES NOTHING!
But she's there to be consoled, and to be inspired by Usagi, so she can go back to the future and make a difference. Or so I've heard. Not that I think it makes anything better.

The scene immediately jumps to Usagi being possessed by her 90s anime self and being compassionate towards the big bad instead of being a merciless tyrant.
Usagi being merciful towards Galaxia does come out of nowhere, right? As much as people might complain, it makes sense in the anime, but here is just... doesn't.

Talentless, you don't understand!!!!!!!!!!!!! In those 6 episodes the Senshis has to fight in a TV station instead of that grandiose river, cemetery, garden, cathedral, and the Cauldron. Aesthetics and concepts always better than storytelling, you know...
I've lost count of the amount of times I've read such things. I've considered mentioning how even back in Literature 101 I was taught that "Epic" refers to heroic characters rather than their surroundings where the story takes place, but nevermind... As I always say, I understand being disappointed in 90's anime Stars, but treating manga Stars/Cosmos as if it's a great story? It boggles my mind, really.
 

Talentless Fool

Aurorae Lunares
Jan 23, 2023
1,449
6,144
1,665
#8
XD I hope people start realising that now the films are out there officially.
I don't think so.

If 50 or so people give a perfect review on Rotten Tomatoes, our whole scheme is gonna go down the drain, Lady Pen!

And you know some people still think Naoko was NEVER influenced by the 90's anime. P-:
The amount of stuff she was influenced and sometimes directly copied from the 90s anime :blush:

Just like the ending of S is basically that of Stars, Usagi conjuring all of the powers/Star Seeds of her friends jumps into a dark mass and has her body nearly shredded.

Talentless, you don't understand!!!!!!!!!!!!! In those 6 episodes the Senshis has to fight in a TV station instead of that grandiose river, cemetery, garden, cathedral, and the Cauldron. Aesthetics and concepts always better than storytelling, you know...
Even the 90s anime trumps the manga on the aesthetics - the finale of UraNep on top of a skyscraper under a dark purple sky, the whole of 199-200 taking place within a wreckage of modern buildings as if the scene shifted into a post apocalyptic era.

I'm also seeing that we've back to the 'if the Crystermos adaptation had more budget, people wouldn't complain'.

First, Crystermos absolutely got the budget it deserved and even a bit more (honestly, Tomoya-kun wasted his budget on the 2 Openings and should have invested them in a sakuga battle of the Ewill Senshi vs UsaMe).
Sailor Moon remains the least performing of Toei's IP both domestically and internationally and somehow it should get more budget than even Dragon Ball is getting????

People even if Crystermos had the budget and visual care as the cult classic Vampire Hunter D ~ Bloodlust, it would still suck because the story is garbage.
A good and engaging story can save an average/mid animation production. A weak sauce story cannot be saved even with Disney's classic fluid animation.
And contrary to what people would like to believe, there ARE changes made to anime productions, simply because the way manga chapters are written is not meant to be written the same as anime episodes/movies.
There's precisely why there's a script writer to review the story and make changes accordingly for the scenario to be smooth to the viewer.

I know I keep bringing Saint Seiya but what can I do when it's the blueprint of how to do things correctly for a revival of a classic manga.

Back in 2003, Toei decided to adapt the Hades arc.
And it was the grand return of the heroes - however in this arc, which is divided into 3 parts, the main heroes - the Bronze 5 - play a very minimal role and only arrive late at the end of the 1st part which this adaptation of 13 episodes was gonna adapt.
So, Toei had Michiko Yokote, modify the story to include the heroes of the story.
Nothing of the main beat was changed, iconic scenes were just the same, the battles were unchanged if not embellished and even the main heroes were given their moment to shine and fight instead of just being spectators in the revival of their own show. :kiss:

But she's there to be consoled, and to be inspired by Usagi, so she can go back to the future and make a difference. Or so I've heard. Not that I think it makes anything better.
Arg!

This is why I never could digest the Stars arc. Usagi is so obnoxious!

I can't help but see what Alyssa Milano did to PhoeMe on Charmed to what Takeuchi did to UsaMe in this final arc.

Yes, Usagi was always Takeuchi's self insert and a conduit through which Hime could live vicariously through but it goes over 9000 here!

In the manga, there are only 2 types of people regardless of their gender -
- either they are in awe, love, admiration over Usagi (I can't believe over the 30 years of Sailor Moon, nobody pointed out that Takeuchi made Haruka in LOVE with Usagi for Infinity, still have an unrequited love for her in Dreams and then I guess she got a new beau in Seiya).
- or they are overtly jealous or obsessed with her beauty, grace, kindness, power or something along those lines...

What an amazing and deep writing level :clap:

In the Sailor Moon manga, everything that breathes in the universe gravitates around UsaMe just like in real life, everything in the Sailor Moon franchise gravitates around Hime-sama.

Usagi being merciful towards Galaxia does come out of nowhere, right? As much as people might complain, it makes sense in the anime, but here is just... doesn't.
Yet!
People, for years, have said that unlike in the 90s anime in which Usagi is a whiny who can't fight, Usagi in the manga is a fighter and so much better. :kiss:

You know I was watching #198 yesterday and it's amazing how just 1 scene, 1 scene not only embodies all of Usagi's supposed journey and development in the last arc of the manga but also happens to be one of the best written scenes of the 90s anime.

Remember the discussion of the Starlights and Usagi after UraNep are killed?

Fighter: Me neither I couldn't understand them. Why go to such lengths and throw away their lives and even that of their comrades? Was it just because it was their way of fighting? That might be true but I figured out that it's just not because of that. Everyone believes in you, you know.

Maker: They believe in...
Healer: Sailor Moon...

Fighter: That's right. And also believe in each other.
You sure are mysterious one. Before I thought that I couldn't fight alongside you guys. However, right now, I'm doing that very thing.
I don't really know why but whenever I'm with you I start to want to believe in other people. I start to believe in you!

Sailor Moon: So then... Are you saying that's why everyone keeps disappearing from my life? Why do things have to be like that?!

Fighter: Don't you know nobody has gone at all?
Maker: Yes. If there would be a time when everyone truly ceases to exist that would be the time when you give up.
Healer: However, everyone firmly believes you'll never give up no matter what.

Fighter: And that's why they all bequeathed their hope onto you... You want to admit defeat to Galaxia? That would probably be easier.

Sailor Moon: No.

Fighter: I knew you would say so! In other words, I too believe in you.
Maker: So do I.
Healer: Me too it seems.

Sailor Moon: Fighter, Healer, Maker... we are all... friends, right?
Fighter: Uh!
Healer: Uh.
Maker: Of course!

Sailor Moon: That's right.

For one, this scene cements the character development of the Starlights.
They are no longer wandering, solitary stars but full fledged Senshi who believe in friendship and each other and prove it in #199 by surpassing themselves over and over to take down Galaxia.

In turn, it also reaffirms Usagi's belief that all hope is not lost and that her way of thinking - compassion towards others - is what all of her friends believe in.
Which we see, again throughout #199 and 200. During the battle of Galaxia vs the Starlights, Usagi manages to see a glimpse of the real Galaxia a couple of times and it's on this belief that as a victim of the war, Galaxia should be saved as well that she acts and ultimately saves everyone.

The 90s anime manages to do in 2 episodes what Takeuchi couldn't in a WHOLE ARC!

In the manga, because Usagi is the perfect being she 'grows' by herself. She is depressed, gets on her feet, battles and immediately figures everything out by herself without the help of anyone else.
It's not only rushed but very shallow as well and very far from what we can call mature story-telling.
If anything, it's the 90s anime scene that is mature.

I've lost count of the amount of times I've read such things. I've considered mentioning how even back in Literature 101 I was taught that "Epic" refers to heroic characters rather than their surroundings where the story takes place, but nevermind... As I always say, I understand being disappointed in 90's anime Stars, but treating manga Stars/Cosmos as if it's a great story? It boggles my mind, really.
And I keep seeing the 'Stars is a deconstruction of the magical girl genre'.

People stop.

I have never watched Madoka despite a lot of my friends requesting it to me, especially with a new movie on the horizon.
You do not want Talentless Fool to actually go and watch Madoka and deconstruct and destroy this whole fantasy of Stars is a deconstruction of the magical girl genre.

If anything, the ending of the Classic anime already did that - the life of a magical girl is not just rainbow and sunshine but it ultimately led to death.
Usagi in the end, resolute to her friends, resigns to give herself the ultimate bliss of a teenage girl - the kiss of the boy she loves and departs for the final battlefield, leaving his corpse behind and knowing she needs to die in order to save the Earth.

Again, Usagi via her feelings of love and friendship, creates another miracle by transmigrating everyone back to Tokyo with everyone losing their powers and memories.
A bittersweet ending however as Artemis implies (even without R), the girls will eventually meet each other again and be friends.
Even Usagi and Mamoru already start to fall in love in the last scene of Classic.

How in the holy shoes of Kaolinite, does Usagi suddenly changing her whole personality of having everything the way she wishes to 'accepting the way things are' to yet again have her way by being granting any of her wishes by the Guardian Cosmos in any way a deconstruction?
 

saintfighteraqua

Aurorae Lunares
Feb 16, 2021
1,576
3,933
1,665
42
City of the Four Kings, Isle of Avalon
#9
I do think these films were the best we were going to get with Takeuchi being tight with the reins.
And I do think the people involved did their best with what they had. It's the most comprehensive the manga story has ever been.

Stars is like the outline of a good story, like a draft.
It's not that all of the concepts and events are bad ones, it's that there's nothing underneath.
The idea of a powerful Senshi taking over the galaxy with brainwashed/puppeteered/intimidated/enslaved/corrupted...wait, did we ever get an actual reason why the Animamates and company serve Galaxia?
*tirade under spoilers

Don't read this unless you just want to see me rant. If you like the Stars arc, don't read it unless you want to be mad.
Spoiler: show
* Were they puppets like the Solar System senshi? Were they just as ruthless? We never get any consensus as far as I'm aware...Siren, Nyanko, Lethe...all of them have different reasoning and it all kind of blurs. I'm fine with each one being a special case, but it's kind of all over the place as to what the bracelets even do. At least in the 90s we see pretty fast that they're a tradeoff for a Star Seed and you lose them, you die.
I don't think that's really clear here.

Then we have the trash level ideas:
Luna and Artemis are from another planet. Why?
If they migrated to the Moon thousands of years ago and knew Nyanko then, is she thousands of years old?
Or just keeps reincarnating with her memories intact?
But she doesn't have sailor Crystal sooooo....?
Have they been visiting Mau recently in secret and that's how they know her? No?
Same deal with Phobos, Deimos and Lead Crow.
Having them be chosen by Mars opens up all sorts of questions and none have answers.
None of these concepts serve any purpose.

Lethe and Mnemosyne (I still say Leeth and Nem-oh-seen like a plebe, sorry!) are pointless.
Any exposition/cat killing they did could have been handled by another character. I don't even hate them. They're just there. They could be good characters. Anything could be a good character, if it's given actual purpose.

Phi and Chi could have been interesting too, but what a couple of nobodies. Naoko really phoned it in both on design and attack names.
Plant Blizzard sounds like a rejected attack from Makoto's arsenal.

Then there's the power scaling. None of it makes sense. It's the most egregious.
The Animamates are so powerful they can one shot a Solar Senshi, even though we are reminded that the Solar System has the most powerful senshi and we're reminded that the Animamates are cheapo imitations.
Then we have the oh-so-scary Papillon who can easily take out Moon, Kakyu and Chibi Chibi...but gets one shotted by the Amazon Quartet. True, they hit her unexpectantly and with what I assume is their version of Planet Attack." but still. So anticlimatic.
Same with Chi and Phi. They're so bad until they're not.
Then we have Sailor Moon remembering she can fly and zooming around dodging Galaxia's attacks. But then she slow-mo jogs to catch her when she turns and runs, just for drama.
Then Galaxia, who can blow up planets with a thought, literally gets smacked JUST once and she is all like: "That's it, I'm done. Chaos won and all my plans are in ruins. I'm out, bye!

I could keep going, but I need to sleep.

I warned you.


Anyway, I got sidetracked. There are a lot of interesting concepts at play but they feel half-cooked.
One excuse I think all manga fans used prior to Crystal (including me) was that Naoko had been rushed and never got to flesh things out. She was having to work so fast and jump from one arc to another she didn't get to tell the story she wanted to.
Back then, that was a very realistic thing to believe and made sense. Maybe it was even true once upon a time.

When PGSM was anounced and the Dark Kingdom Arc was expanded I was a bit excited to see how she expanded the manga which was rereleasing.
Then we got the the updated manga and she fixed it...by adding a few pupils here and there she didn't draw in the 90s and cleaned up a few mistakes (just a few, mind you. Praying Mantis arms don't count.)
And I was like...hmmmm. That's odd, she has had about 6 years at this point to tell her story as she intended. The art looked mostly better and she added in the PGSM attack names for some reason, which was fine. But where was all the content to fill the gaps?
I eventually got bored of buying a bad English translation of a series I already owned (Spark-RING Wide Pressure, really?) and stopped at volume 5 and the 2 Sailor V volumes.

Then the Eternal volumes were announced as the definitive versions of Sailor Moon.
I didn't hold out much hope and of course this was yet another way just to milk the same fans...and I'm a fool. So I bought them all.
(They are the definitive version, by the way, gorgeous if you like the manga. But the updates were again incredibly small.)

Anyway, what I'm getting at, whether it was something Naoko said or just some head-canon manga fans had, there is no more to the manga. The manga as it was and as it is is what Naoko wants. She thinks it's fine.
Those half-cooked ideas? Hime apparently likes her manga steaks cooked rare.
 

Yamoon

Aurorae Lunares
Jul 17, 2006
1,062
1,166
1,665
41
#10
Nothing of the main beat was changed, iconic scenes were just the same, the battles were unchanged if not embellished and even the main heroes were given their moment to shine and fight instead of just being spectators in the revival of their own show. :kiss:
well for sure for the first part (13 episodes). But the second and third part were more or less 1/1 manga and it was extremely bad adapted… and let me not start about the animation quality (even the worst episode of Crystal was better than the last 6 episodes of Hades). Kurumada was so mad at Toei that he even decide to leave them at that time (that plus the movie that he hates from them).
 

Talentless Fool

Aurorae Lunares
Jan 23, 2023
1,449
6,144
1,665
#11
well for sure for the first part (13 episodes). But the second and third part were more or less 1/1 manga and it was extremely bad adapted… and let me not start about the animation quality (even the worst episode of Crystal was better than the last 6 episodes of Hades). Kurumada was so mad at Toei that he even decide to leave them at that time (that plus the movie that he hates from them).
Nothing is that simple.

The Hades Sanctuary adaptation was a success.

The episodes were first broadcast on pay-per view which were a success.
The DVD sales were a success around 30k per volume.

Bandai initially released only the 5 main characters as figurines, opening the Myth Cloth line, with little faith only for these figurines to sell like hot cakes.
Over the years now, there have been several different lines with the Myth Cloth and EX line being extremely successful with well over a 100 characters released.

Even Toei didn't have much faith that this OVA series would be more than a decent success that's why there were so many budgetary cuts - non original Opening song (Chikyuugi), heavy use of CGI...

What happened with the rest of the OVAs is solely because of the critical and financial flop that was the Overture movie (again Toei even went beyond wanting to give a stand-alone movie to bank on the success of the OVAs).

This movie has the same mysticism that Stars has in the Sailor Moon fandom with fans glossing over it's aesthetic when it's a very poor movie.
Yamauchi brought his horrible fanfiction to life with Seiya and Saori being completely OOC despite reportedly Kurumada, knowing that Yamauchi was struggling with the deadlines and story approached to help him only for Yamauchi to continue to reassure the original author everything was going fine and his ideas were being respected (which were absolutely not).
The financial failure of the movie ended up with Bandai backing out as a sponsor and Toei having to fund by itself the rest of the OVAs without a production committee as in the credits they are solely credited.

The 5th movie is a completely lost cause and anything sprouting out of that would have been a failure, especially with the Japanese fans vehemently rejecting Yamauchi's style.
We have the sequel to the 5th movie in Yamauchi's Casshern Sins with an amnesiac Seiya look-alike voyaging in a post-apocalyptic world in search of a girl with cryptic and repetitive screenplay and confusing battle sequences.

And sorry - NO.
The Hades Inferno and Elysion OVAs still look better than Crystal I/II.
Sure they barely have any animation especially for the last 2 Inferno OVAs and pretty much all of Elysion and the art is still outstanding.

Characters with complicated armors are still drawn correctly, perspectives are respected, animators still know how anatomy works no matter how far the camera is to the character, characters are super expressive.

The main problem is the very boring screenplay with a storyboard completely faithful to Kurumada's.
They still injected some new stuff here and there throughout the adaptation even if they were minimal like a quick additional scene of Marin finding Seika in a field of flowers and later guiding Seika by the hand to the Sanctuary as they both witness the advent of the Greatest Eclipse.

Aside from that Toei still gave us Omega S1 (which was very good and had good ratings) and the Legend of Sanctuary CGI movie with Kurumada as exec producer at a worldwide revenue of $20 million (which for a CGI stand-alone movie of a niche series is more than commendable).

In the manga side of things, in 2003, Episode G also debuted which at it's peak was a success as well with roughly +20k sales per volume.

Then we had The Lost Canvas (which was an even bigger success), which thanks to Kurumada taking the anime adaptation to TMS, we got the most polished 2D modern Saint Seiya adaptation.
Next Dimension, which regardless of what you may think of the story, art or release schedule (hectic release which was confirmed to be on Akita's side wanting ND to be an annual, seasonal manga despite Kurumada finishing the chapters several months in advance) is still the biggest success of the franchise with over 30-35k sales in the first weeks.

Today both Episode G and The Lost Canvas have become their own separate series with their own sequels and spin-offs.
TLC just released an Audio Drama based on a new chapter.
Counting manga volumes alone, since 2003, we've had nearly 120 tankobons worth of new content.

So yes, overall Saint Seiya's revival (2003-2006+) was a frank success compared to whatever Crystermos has been.
 

NJ_

Gurges Ater
Oct 31, 2009
9,797
4,332
1,665
38
Wallington, NJ
#13
What happened with the rest of the OVAs is solely because of the critical and financial flop that was the Overture movie (again Toei even went beyond wanting to give a stand-alone movie to bank on the success of the OVAs).

The financial failure of the movie ended up with Bandai backing out as a sponsor and Toei having to fund by itself the rest of the OVAs without a production committee as in the credits they are solely credited.
There wasn't a committee for Hades Sanctuary either, it was only with that movie where there was one.
 
Feb 20, 2023
317
957
665
#14
Nothing is that simple.
There is a lost of missing information in your post.

Hades Sanctuary was a big success, and the Overture movie was planned as the first in a trilogy to ride on that success as a media mix reboot of the canon storyline, but it flopped and audiences and Masami Kurumada disliked it. As a result Toei reduced the budget for the rest of Hades and replaced all the voice actors. Hades Sanctuary was selling 19000 units and Inferno and Elysion dropped to less than half of that, falling to 5300 units.

TMS did animate The Lost Canvas as an OVA but you fail to mention that regardless of quality this project was cancelled because of poor disc sales, ending up at 1400 units.

In 2012, Toei rebooted the series with the televised Omega which averaged little over 400 units and failed to launch a toy line. Reception was controversial and they changed directors, writers, and designers for its second and final season. I recall you arguing that Crystal changing staff and style for its third season should be seen as a rebrand due to its failures in this post so I would expect you to apply that same logic to Omega.

That same year, the Legend of Sanctuary movie was a modest box office success and it's weird that your summary ends there because the 2015 Soul of Gold ONA was also successful, its animation quality was low but it sold 3600 avg. units and launched a very profitable toy line.

However, your summary leaves out Saint Seiya's recent failures. The 2018 Saintia Sho ONA had such a terrible quality that the manga author had to ask people to stop insulting the anime staff and the series was cancelled with 300 avg. units sold, and the 2019 Knights of the Zodiac 3DCG reboot was marred by controversy for gender swapping characters and westernizing the story. It was branded a Netflix original anime but Netflix dropped it after its first season with Crunchyroll airing the rest, without any merch released for it.

You also fail to mention Toei's 2023 live action movie that flopped so hard they had a special report about its failure on their financial reports.

All in all outside of the manga the revival has two strong successes, few modest ones, and a lot of cancellations and even catastrophic flops as acknowledged by Toei themselves.

Characters with complicated armors are still drawn correctly, perspectives are respected, animators still know how anatomy works no matter how far the camera is to the character, characters are super expressive.


So yes, overall Saint Seiya's revival (2003-2006+) was a frank success compared to whatever Crystermos has been.
Sailor Moon Crystal averaged 3000 unit sales for the ONA and 1700 for its televised season. This is modest compared to the Sanctuary OVAs, but successful compared to its medium equals: the ONA is up there with Saint Seiya's most successful ONA and decimates its least successful one, and its televised series also sold over four times Saint Seiya's televised reboot. Toei's financial reports even lament for an entire year that "revenues fell sharply with the absence of Blu-ray/DVD equivalent to Sailor Moon Crystal" after it ended, affirming how strong Crystal was for them.

We don't have solid data on the movies but at least they've never had to create a special section about how much money they lost on it like they have had to do with Saint Seiya's most recent project which is estimated to have cost them over 50 million dollars.

Next Dimension, which regardless of what you may think of the story, art or release schedule (hectic release which was confirmed to be on Akita's side wanting ND to be an annual, seasonal manga despite Kurumada finishing the chapters several months in advance) is still the biggest success of the franchise with over 30-35k sales in the first weeks.
I can only imagine that if Naoko Takeuchi took eighteen years to finish a sequel manga you wouldn't be excusing her release schedule, much less if its quality was equivalent to Next Dimension.

One excuse I think all manga fans used prior to Crystal (including me) was that Naoko had been rushed and never got to flesh things out. She was having to work so fast and jump from one arc to another she didn't get to tell the story she wanted to.
Back then, that was a very realistic thing to believe and made sense. Maybe it was even true once upon a time.
It is true. She has said so herself.

Anyway, what I'm getting at, whether it was something Naoko said or just some head-canon manga fans had, there is no more to the manga. The manga as it was and as it is is what Naoko wants. She thinks it's fine.
Those half-cooked ideas? Hime apparently likes her manga steaks cooked rare.
This is also true. It is Osabu who has said that the manga being undercooked is what makes it strong since it allows readers to continue to imagine and engage with it.

It seems your issue is that you expect her to revise her manga but it's been obvious for decades that she will not, Sailor Moon is what it is and nobody is going to alter its story. There are many different takes that attempt to fix or rearrange the story in different mediums and that should allow most fans to make peace with this if they dislike the manga being undercooked, and I imagine that this acceptance of what the manga is is why outside of this forum most people react positively to Cosmos instead of bitterly lamenting how their own expectations not being met.
 

Lady Pen

Aurorae Lunares
Mar 12, 2021
1,584
5,423
1,665
#15
I knew it, I knew it!!!!!! @Talentless Fool , @Hadibou , @Starlight , I won the bet !!!!!!! You owe me a couple of Gin and Tonics. :booze:

Oh, and by the way, did you guys know that Sailor Moon Cosmos has been a smashing success? It’s got a score of 89 and 100 for the first and second parts on Rotten Tomatoes with fewer than 50 ratings!!!



::toast:
 

Talentless Fool

Aurorae Lunares
Jan 23, 2023
1,449
6,144
1,665
#16
the Overture movie was planned as the first in a trilogy to ride on that success as a media mix reboot of the canon storyline
I think it's you who's got your wires crossed.

It's Kurumada, after seeing the success of the Hades OVAs, who wanted a direct sequel to the Hades Chapter in anime format as at that time he was busy writing Ring ni Kakero 2.

There was no media mix reboot.
Despite the visual changes in the OVA adaption, it wasn't a reboot.
I think even the notes mention that despite Camus and Hyoga meeting in Siberia, Hyoga didn't know who he was.
There was even the so-called OVA Zero as a summary of the 86 anime to tie in to the Hades OVAs.

Toei, on the other hand, wanted to do a stand-alone movie and thought it would be a bad idea to go on directly with the sequel to Hades without the adaptation even complete and as such bamboozled Kurumada.
The production was so chaotic between meeting the demands of both Toei and Kurumada that Michiko Yokote, who was supposed to write the story, dropped out of the project.

I have seen fans saying it was meant to be a trilogy but never seen the source.
What is also known is that the trajectory was going to have 3 Chapters - Tenkai-hen (Heaven Chapter), Tentei-hen (Chapter of the Sky Emperor) and ending with the Jikyu-hen (Chapter of Space-Time) which would come out of the movie's events.
Whether these chapters would be in the form of movies or OVAs ultimately would probably have depended on the Overture movie which itself was promoted as a simple prologue.

TMS did animate The Lost Canvas as an OVA but you fail to mention that regardless of quality this project was cancelled because of poor disc sales, ending up at 1400 units.
And you fail to explain why.

TMS over played their hand and expected the DVD sales to be as successful as the Hades Sanctuary sales based on name alone and via the success of the manga.
Unlike the Hades OVAs, they were released directly to DVD (quite overpriced) and received very little fanfare and promotion.
Not to mention, the international fans severely pirated the series.
Aside from directly buying the DVDs/BDs, there was no revenue source for TMS and it was a bad move from them - which I have also talked about before.

In 2012, Toei rebooted the series with the televised Omega which averaged little over 400 units and failed to launch a toy line. Reception was controversial and they changed directors, writers, and designers for its second and final season. I recall you arguing that Crystal changing staff and style for its third season should be seen as a rebrand due to its failures in this post so I would expect you to apply that same logic to Omega.
You fail to mention that Omega was a TV series and DVD sales are irrelevant.

Omega, as a TV series, was successful via it's viewership rating but failed to sell toys - which I have also talked about before.

In turn, Omega was deemed a failure and in order to sell more toys, they changed the chara-designer and stripped the series of most of it's budget as a piss-poor attempt to sell toys without putting in much effort - which I have also talked about before.

That same year, the Legend of Sanctuary movie was a modest box office success and it's weird that your summary ends there because the 2015 Soul of Gold ONA was also successful, its animation quality was low but it sold 3600 avg. units and launched a very profitable toy line.

However, your summary leaves out Saint Seiya's recent failures. The 2018 Saintia Sho ONA had such a terrible quality that the manga author had to ask people to stop insulting the anime staff and the series was cancelled with 300 avg. units sold, and the 2019 Knights of the Zodiac 3DCG reboot was marred by controversy for gender swapping characters and westernizing the story. It was branded a Netflix original anime but Netflix dropped it after its first season with Crunchyroll airing the rest, without any merch released for it.
You would notice that as my ending quote, I mentioned Saint Seiya's revival era - 2003-2006 and how projects that debuted from that time frame were successes for the most part.

As for Kotz, every one knows it's just a pet series for Toei to show it's 3D expertise, just like the live action movie was to flaunt their 'expertise' in the domain.
Kotz was never meant nor produced to sell toys or merchandise.

All in all outside of the manga the revival has two strong successes, few modest ones, and a lot of cancellations and even catastrophic flops as acknowledged by Toei themselves.
Manga:
Saint Seiya Next Dimension - success

Saint Seiya Episode G - success (and yes, I'll mention the declining ratings of the manga's end cycle which are due to Okada's health problems that caused a great hiatus time).
Saint Seiya Assassin G + Requiem - success

Saint Seiya - The Lost Canvas - success
Saint Seiya - The Lost Canvas Anecdotes - success, prompting 5 extra volumes (Deuteros, double Old Twins & Shion) + Bangai-hen, with sporadic chapters still published because of it's popularity.

Saint Seiya - Saintia Sho - mild success at debut, flop by the end.

Saint Seiya - Dark Wing - seems like a decent success

Saint Seiya - Rerise of Poseidon - success

Anime:
Saint Seiya - Hades Sanctuary - success

Saint Seiya - Overture - failure
Saint Seiya - Hades Inferno & Elysion - direct consequence of Overture's failure

Saint Seiya ~ The Lost Canvas - anime - poor DVD sales and eventual cancellation due to TMS' poor promotional campaign.
(I'll also mention that just recently out of the blue, TLC got an audio drama for an exclusive chapter retaining the seiyuus of the anime adaptation).

Saint Seiya - Omega S1 - successful as a TV series, failure as a toy promotional pub spot
Saint Seiya - Omega S2 - failure as both a TV series and toy pub spot

Saint Seiya - Legend of Sanctuary - success

Saint Seiya - Soul of Gold - has more viewership than Crystal ever had (50 milion views before the last episode), was a shameless pub shot for selling toys which it succeded in.

Saint Seiya - Saintia Sho - you fail to mention the history behind the anime adaptation and how Toei's head honchos didn't believe a Saint Seiya girl version would sell but since after the TLC debacle they had already bought the rights to the IP and the manga was already axed due to poor sales, they had to push something off to recuperate their investment and severely stripped the production of what we can suppose the already poor budget.

Saint Seiya - Knights of Zodiac - Do I even need to elaborate?
Saint Seiya - Live Action - Do I even need to elaborate? X2


Oh my! Oh my!
Look at this bad art!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My eyes! My eyes!!!!!!!

Crystal is so much better! :rofl:









But here, I'll put this one ugly shot for you



I can only imagine that if Naoko Takeuchi took eighteen years to finish a sequel manga you wouldn't be excusing her release schedule, much less if its quality was equivalent to Next Dimension.
Akita Shoten imposed the release schedule to Kurumada.
Just like during the same time (sometime around TLC's Anecdotes) Akita imposed a surge in the Gold Saint's time presence in all mangas - something that majorly plagued Saintia Sho and even Assassin G.
That redundant Gold spectacle of ND is imposed by Akita Shoten because these characters sell.

As for Takeuchi, she is too lazy to even write something over the time of 1 year, let alone 18 years lol.

Funny for the one who says respect Naoko Takeuchi but is always pushing Kurumada, a man who hasn't stopped writing for 50 years, into the mud each time as a poor attempt to gratify Takeuchi.
 

Yamoon

Aurorae Lunares
Jul 17, 2006
1,062
1,166
1,665
41
#17
As for Takeuchi, she is too lazy to even write something over the time of 1 year, let alone 18 years
Maybe she’s just happy about what she wrote and just want to leave it this way and just keep making money with that. It worked till now why should she change it if she’s happy with her situation?

That’s funny that you seem to feel that she owe you something, is that why you’re so frustrated with her ? Because opposite to Kurumada known as the Manga George Lucas she’s not letting her manga turning into 50th different spinoff? :oh: (That’s a legit question)
 
Last edited:
Feb 20, 2023
317
957
665
#18
There was no media mix reboot.
Kurumada Productions calls Overture part of a メディアミックス here and Masami Kurumada also talks about wanting his new storyline to be told in media mix in Overture's pamphlet.

I have seen fans saying it was meant to be a trilogy but never seen the source.
Same source,「そして、全三部作になるような形で作りたい」.

And you fail to explain why.
We can talk about why so many Saint Seiya projects have been cancelled or failed in the last two decades. Overture's production was messy, TMS overplayed their hand, Saintia Sho had a poor budget, the movie might just be a pet project, but the bottom line is that they all failed. If you don't take the time to detail the circumstances that led to Crystal's rushed animation every time you talk about its failings, I don't see why we must be so demure when talking about the many quantifiable flops in Saint Seiya.

You would notice that as my ending quote, I mentioned Saint Seiya's revival era - 2003-2006 and how projects that debuted from that time frame were successes for the most part.
What I would notice is the plus sign after 2006 in your original "Saint Seiya's revival (2003-2006+)" quote, and that plus sign would include many flops, one of which cost Toei several millions of dollars.

Saint Seiya - Soul of Gold - has more viewership than Crystal ever had (50 milion views before the last episode)
I don't disagree but what made Soul of Gold successful was that it sold discs and toys. Viewership is important but Toei's reports measure success in sales (and singles out Crystal as a successful seller).

Oh my! Oh my!
Look at this bad art!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posting good scenes doesn't make the ugly ones go away. You claimed the OVAs always maintained good perspectives and anatomy and that just isn't true. If someone replied to the awful web Crystal screenshots with a bunch of good ones, you could rightfully call it coping and that's what you're doing with Inferno.

It's not just the art, the OVAs after Sanctuary have awful animations and it's all the more disappointing because Sanctuary was impeccable and its sequel had scenes like this:


Crystal is so much better! :rofl:
Funny for the one who says respect Naoko Takeuchi
I haven't said anything about Crystal's quality or respecting Naoko Takeuchi, please stop hallucinating. All I'm pointing out is that you excuse or disregard every failure, including multimillionaire losses, in Saint Seiya and Kurumada Productions while criticizing Sailor Moon and PNP for less economically damaging projects. It is an obvious and massive double standard.

Oh, and by the way, did you guys know that Sailor Moon Cosmos has been a smashing success? It’s got a score of 89 and 100 for the first and second parts on Rotten Tomatoes with fewer than 50 ratings!!!
I see you still resent the fact that Eternal got positive professional reviews in the west because it goes against what you want to believe, but nobody is talking about Rotten Tomatoes or even critical reception, so please also stop hallucinating.

Maybe she’s just happy about what she wrote and just want to leave it this way and just keep making money with that. It worked till now why should she change it if she’s happy with her situation?

That’s funny that you seem to feel that she owe you something, is that why you’re so frustrated with her ?
Some posters here are unable to understand that not everything is made for their specific preferences and so they cannot grasp why Naoko Takeuchi and manga fans would be able to appreciate the manga for what it is. They believe that she has to let others adapt her story endlessly, even though other adaptations already exist, but it's not enough and this frustrates them.
 
Likes: MsImagination
Jul 5, 2009
12,527
5,156
1,665
Philippines
#19
The manga as it was and as it is is what Naoko wants. She thinks it's fine.
Those half-cooked ideas? Hime apparently likes her manga steaks cooked rare.

Every now and again, someone comes up and claim most of us who aren't fond of Crystal are just too blinded by our nostalgia, and now and again I've seen comments on social media of people saying they're crying their hearts out, that they felt the movie was incredibly emotional and so on and so forth, and I'm still bemused. It's not like I thoroughly hated the films, mostly because I've loved these characters for so long and seeing Chibi Usa say goodbye to Usagi, for example, does make me emotional. But I feel any sort of enjoyment I had was almost despite, instead of because, what the films themselves were. I can still kind of look past the films and see some nice ideas, thoughtful messages and good intentions, but I'm not watching ideas, messages, and intentions, I'm watching two films, and taking them for what they are. If nostalgia is that big a factor, I'm left with the impression that, if it wasn't for nostalgia, no one would enjoy these films at all.
As for Takeuchi, she is too lazy to even write something over the time of 1 year, let alone 18 years lol.

Funny for the one who says respect Naoko Takeuchi but is always pushing Kurumada, a man who hasn't stopped writing for 50 years, into the mud each time as a poor attempt to gratify Takeuchi.

I knew it, I knew it!!!!!! @Talentless Fool , @Hadibou , @Starlight , I won the bet !!!!!!! You owe me a couple of Gin and Tonics. :booze:

Oh, and by the way, did you guys know that Sailor Moon Cosmos has been a smashing success? It’s got a score of 89 and 100 for the first and second parts on Rotten Tomatoes with fewer than 50 ratings!!!


 
Apr 19, 2024
228
668
665
34
#20
Stars is like the outline of a good story, like a draft.
It's not that all of the concepts and events are bad ones, it's that there's nothing underneath.
The idea of a powerful Senshi taking over the galaxy with brainwashed/puppeteered/intimidated/enslaved/corrupted...wait, did we ever get an actual reason why the Animamates and company serve Galaxia?
Agreed. There's this differentiation that needs to be done, and I apologise if that's not the right way to translate into English, but there's the story, the events we're being told, and the narrative, the way they're being told. A story can be told in an infinite number of ways, sometimes a great story will take the form of a poor narrative or vice versa. As many plot holes and inconsistensies Stars had, I don't think the story itself is (all) bad, but the narrative is so sketchy and convoluted, it's dreadful.

Those half-cooked ideas? Hime apparently likes her manga steaks cooked rare.
I think I'm gonna print this out, have it framed and delivered to some people I've known! lol

It is true. She has said so herself.
Wait, she either couldn't tell the story she wanted because she was rushed, or she actually managed to do it and things the manga is perfectly fine as it is, but not both. And while I do believe she could have been rushed and tired, she did have assistants to help her out, so her complaining sounds a tiny bit like playing the victim to me. It's not like she was an exceptional case in being overworking after all, right?

This is also true. It is Osabu who has said that the manga being undercooked is what makes it strong since it allows readers to continue to imagine and engage with it.
He might have said that, but I doubt he actually believes it. It's the lamest excuse ever, and it sounds more like a cop-out to try to portray the manga in a good light, as if its shortcomings aren't actually, you know, shortcomings.

It seems your issue is that you expect her to revise her manga but it's been obvious for decades that she will not, Sailor Moon is what it is and nobody is going to alter its story.
You're being disingenuous. @saintfighteraqua made it clear the comment was that, unlike what was widely believed, maybe the manga wasn't rushed and undercooked because of the circumstances in which it was produced, and that the constant re-releases and minor touch-ups it had might have bunked on fan expectations that Takeuchi would, for once, flesh something out and change things she hadn't been able to pull off before - none of which was the case after all. There are many different takes that attempt to fix or rearrange the story in different mediums and that should allow most fans to make peace with this if they dislike the manga being undercooked, and I imagine that this acceptance of what the manga is is why outside of this forum most people react positively to Cosmos instead of bitterly lamenting how their own expectations not being met.[/QUOTE]

Maybe she’s just happy about what she wrote and just want to leave it this way and just keep making money with that. It worked till now why should she change it if she’s happy with her situation?

That’s funny that you seem to feel that she owe you something, is that why you’re so frustrated with her ? Because opposite to Kurumada known as the Manga George Lucas she’s not letting her manga turning into 50th different spinoff? :oh: (That’s a legit question)
I'm not @Talentless Fool but I think he'd agree with me in that it's not that we think Naoko owes us something, but rather that since 1997 she's been basically standing in the way of the success of her franchise. Sailor Moon was a huge phenomenon and it still cashes on the stellar success it was in the 90s, but it's a franchise that has (had?) much more potential if only things were (had been) handled better. Naoko's weird licensing eccentricities, her demanding that honorifics be kept in foreign dubs, combined with her not only not producing anything new while preventing others from developing her franchise further are frustrating to say the least. None of which would be a problem, of course, if the franchise was just left in the past, as something we could just remember fondly. Instead, it's still being brought back from its afterlife and treated as a cash cow and being on Vogue, while the media itself, the animations and the manga, are incredibly subpar. It feels like it's diminishing the value of the brand, to be honest.