Naoko Takeuchi's Recent Artwork

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

sapphire91

Stella Nova
Jul 6, 2018
6,461
9,208
1,665
I also like Haruka and Michiru dressing together like a couple. Thats so sweet :haruka::mihiru:::love::. Also, for some reason I can't help but think of the Legend of Zelda when I see Haruka with that sword.
OMG, now all I see is Legend of Zelda :D It really really gives that vibe. Imagine Naoko might played some of the early Zelda's back in the day. Or even now - she has kids.
 
Last edited:
Likes: YuYu Yuichiro

Akari @ria

Lumen Cinererum
Jun 17, 2017
265
403
165
Here's my personal opinion:

The images for Chanel are not bad, perhaps the poses are a bit stiff and there are some imperfections in the proportions (it's the clothes that don't inspire me much XD )

in another topic it was said that Naoko's style hasn't evolved, but that's not the case. It has evolved and changed over time (sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse).
I didn't like the style she had in shinsouban, the senshi looked too young and the poses a bit stiff.
i prefer her current style than shinsouban's, at least it's closer to her original style.
Sometimes the proportions she currently draws aren't perfect and the poses a bit stiff, however the illustrations for the ice show are perfect. *w*

I don't think at all she left the job of drawing the illustrations to her assistants, proof n.1 is the fact that in the videos in which she is interviewed she draws the illustrations (you see 2 different ones), then she said that she had only one assistant with a similar style to hers and therefore could not delegate too much work (if i remember correctly she have written it in one of the notes in the manga).

then the fact that she hardly draws anymore and hasn't produced many manga after Sailormoon is not an indication of incapacity. Love witch had excellent premises.
The stories Naoko made after Sailormoon, almost all of them, were interrupted ...
I would feel unappreciated if this happened to me.
I think she has a genuine passion for creating manga, however one has to see her circumstances.
I understand how it feels to be under constant pressure from something bigger than you, so if she doesn't feel like working as much as before, I don't see why criticize her.

For example Ai yazawa took a break, I think permanently, for health reasons, leaving her manga "Nana" on indefinite hiatus. I don't blame her and she's no less mangaka than she was before just because she doesn't feel like working anymore.
As far as I know she just posted a few new images and one short chapter of a different story (one shot).

Sailormoon manga isn't perfect, but neither is trashy as some want it to pass. Anyway, i've seen much worse drawn manga produced than Sailormoon and still successful, perhaps even with less demanding stories that sometimes the mangaka hadn't even written, therefore, why so much anger and obstinacy toward Naoko?

And also...

If she was so resentful she wouldn't have gone back to work with Kodansha or Toei.
Since Sailormoon many of Naoko ideas have been quashed. Many manga of her have been discontinued.
If she were really a control freak and she didn't accept rejections she would be screaming like a possessed madwoman on the street, instead she has drawn some tables where she manages to defuse even an horrible experience like an abortion.

Instead of demonizing her at all costs, why not try to really get to know her?

I swallowed bitter mouthfuls, regretting it later because it only hurt me, if she had all this resentment accumulated inside her she would have already gone crazy for some time.

Furthermore, if she only longs to money, she would have left part of the rights in the hands of Toei who would have had new series churn out with their concepts and new gadgets galore and she would have lived on an income for the rest of her life.


And there are everyone's personal tastes.

Each Mangaka, as well as each artist, is a world of its own.
Comparing them to each other is something incorrect, as each one has strengths, weaknesses and peculiar characteristics.
Obviously there are those who are more or less good than another.
This should be a stimulus to encourage the artist or mangaka to improve, not a cue to criticize with venom.

And then I'm tired of the fact that the intelligence and culture of those who like the Sailormoon manga are constantly offended, personal opinions ok, but here we exaggerate.

For example, I don't like much the 90s anime because I find it full of flaws, but I don't create 108374650724568 posts grumbling about it or denigrating whoever produced it.
I'm just saying that Toei with the remake don't put the same effort and care that they put into making the 90s anime, even on a creative level.
 
Aug 16, 2014
3,205
2,001
1,665
USA
Yes, it can be quite overwhelming when you like some new trailer and check this forum to see discussions and you see people discussing ad-hominem about how horrible it looks. Of course if something has flaws we should talk about it, but it's exhausting the way it happens here, almost as if they want us to feel guilty for not thinking Cosmos looks horrible from the trailers?

When it's all huge dissertative thesis about how Naoko's a horrible mangaka, or about how Toei sucks, or how the 90s anime is so much better, about how they didn't draw 4000 frames for a 10-second sequence in some new trailer, and how Sailor Moon's "forgotten and irrelevant" and that's why Toei's cheap about it...

And then they answer with sarcastic condescending comments saying we want "everyone to love crystal" and how we think "Princess Naoko-hime-sama can't do no wrong" when literally the only thing we want is not just see endless toxic rambling about something these people are supposedly fans of.
Everytime you see something new or need thread.You have the same people.Who goes just mock, condescened, or bash.If you say anything good about manga,crystal, or Naoko Tsukevhi
Than they treat their own opinions like there facts, and treat everyone else like there lesser.
 

sapphire91

Stella Nova
Jul 6, 2018
6,461
9,208
1,665
Regarding Naoko style - it surely evolved. People that prefer something cute and silly, a la 90s anime/ her more casual style from the beginning or her cute style in the early 2000s might find her new art terrible. On the other hand there are people that prefer the more serious and model-esque aspect of her art. In my personal opinion her faces specifically got a lot better with the years, but once again - it is subjective. But her style certainly changes. Some people find the more elegant and prettified style boring, which is fine, but keep in it is your personal opinion. There is one OBJEVCTIVE UNIVERSAL TRUTH THOUGH - CRYSTAL SEASON 3 AKIRA'S DESIGNS ARE ABOMINATION.
 
Jul 6, 2012
692
1,909
1,665
2022/2023 Métiers d’art

The clothes are inspired by Africa

This is a retro collection that reminds me of the work that Giorgio di Sant’ Angelo did in the 1970s, but with the codes of Karl Lagerfeld & Chanel (e.g. a lot of tweed, layered costume jewelry and pearls):

Actually these clothes are way better in reality than how Takeuchi drew them, which is too bad since it's supposed to be a promo collab :(

Her art was at it's best during the middle of the Dream arc. The Minako Dream Chapter is probably her best work (for once she was drawing backgrounds and the jungle scenery greatly adds depth to her work) while the next one, the Outers chapter, is probably one of her worst with characters just standing with their hair in the wind lol.
And unfortunately it was adaptated the same way in Eternal :/

I really like the Cover Arts from the Shinsoban edition - what is really good about them is that the girls are very expressive and have some body language/good poses.
People say that there is much negativity in each thread about Naoko...
... but that's not the truth, we are aknowledging when it's well done. And these covers were nicely done (although I can understand some people not liking them since they are not representative of the manga art). You can tell that she had fun doing this, characters are cute, colors are lively.

Honestly I cannot wait for this reboot to be over so I won't feel the need to talk about it and leave this forum and this fandom, because in the last couple of years it is beyond toxic on here. People claim Naoko has no talent, that Sailor Moon is whatever phobic, that everything is problematic. Jeez.
No offense but you have yourself brought your own share of "toxicity" there, calling everything that is not your taste ugly / frog mouth / spaghetti hair etc.

She is still pushing re-editions of her manga, isn't she?
@Hadibou mentioned having bought all of the Japanese editions - don't you think Takeuchi has a certain duty to uphold towards such dedicated fans?
Yeah I have no control over myself when it's about collections so I end up buying everything haha. Therefore I feel authorized to criticize, but her work on SM is still dearly to me even since it's a children thing. But it seems people have pain to understand that concept: you can like something and heavily criticize the same thing at the same time. What a concept eh ?

@Hadibou The thing were not talking if the art has good composition or not.We we're talking about if the art is good or beautiful .Which is base on opinion and personal taste.
The thing is that it's hard for some of us to like something that has so many mistakes (and anatomy for example is not a matter of taste, there are body proportions, muscle flexibility etc.).
I can to a certain extend like something that has weird composition or weird anatomy if it doesn't perturb my experience. As I said earlier, I like her manga because there is a cool story, characters I like, color illustrations that had nice color settings (not always but you know what I mean) etc. It's not perfect but there are other stronger points that activate the suspension of disbelief on my mind. Now, 30 years later, there is no more apologies.

It's totally fine for you to like this, really, but for people who know a bit about anatomy, composition, color theory, it's really painful to watch (and I'm not saying this to feel superior or anything).


Everytime you see something new or need thread.You have the same people.Who goes just mock, condescened, or bash.If you say anything good about manga,crystal, or Naoko Tsukevhi
Than they treat their own opinions like there facts, and treat everyone else like there lesser.
May I repeat one more time this: criticizing =/= hate / toxicity.
And I don't understand, do you mean only people liking Takeuchi's art should post in this thread ? Maybe it should be renamed then ?
 
Last edited:

SignorinaTsukino

Lumen Cinererum
Jan 16, 2017
480
600
665
Italy
Regarding Naoko style - it surely evolved. People that prefer something cute and silly, a la 90s anime/ her more casual style from the beginning or her cute style in the early 2000s might find her new art terrible. On the other hand there are people that prefer the more serious and model-esque aspect of her art. In my personal opinion her faces specifically got a lot better with the years, but once again - it is subjective. But her style certainly changes. Some people find the more elegant and prettified style boring, which is fine, but keep in it is your personal opinion. There is one OBJEVCTIVE UNIVERSAL TRUTH THOUGH - CRYSTAL SEASON 3 AKIRA'S DESIGNS ARE ABOMINATION.
For me her art is at her peak when she mixes both the cute al la 90' anime style and the graceful, ethereal style. This is why the Stars arc is visually the most beautiful part of the Manga in my opinion, in it she uses both styles gorgeously
 
Jan 23, 2023
652
2,144
1,665
People say that there is much negativity in each thread about Naoko...
We, the dark druids, who analyze Takeuchi's art spew venomssszzzzzz

On one hand it is forbidden to analyze and criticize Takeuchi's work. If you do, you're labelled as desperate, a hater and toxic to the fandom.
On the other hand, it is perfectly acceptable to label Takahashi's work as an abomination and it's totally fine.

Yeah I have no control over myself when it's about collections so I end up buying everything haha.
Believe me I'm guilty as well.
Whenever there's a line-up for an anime I particularly like, I always end up buying everything.
When I was still new to the 'collec' them all' shtick, I once raced all over Tokyo to get all of the Tower Records Banana Fish goods collab, going to 3 different stores before all the goods were sold out, and tried again the next day.
I was only at ease once I realized that the goods would be available for mail order at a later date. :P

May I repeat one more time this: criticizing =/= hate / toxicity.
And I don't understand, do you mean only people liking Takeuchi's art should post in this thread ? Maybe it should be renamed then ?
I too think this thread should be renamed 'Let's spread our love for Naoko's art'.
The very first post of this thread mentions about sharing opinions on how Takeuchi's art has evolved and devolved but it's clearly not allowed.
 
Aug 16, 2014
3,205
2,001
1,665
USA
Actually these clothes are way better in reality than how Takeuchi drew them, which is too bad since it's supposed to be a promo collab :(


And unfortunately it was adaptated the same way in Eternal :/



...


No offense but you have yourself brought your own share of "toxicity" there, calling everything that is not your taste ugly / frog mouth / spaghetti hair etc.






The thing is that it's hard for some of us to like something that has so many mistakes (and anatomy for example is not a matter of taste, there are body proportions, muscle flexibility etc.).
I can to a certain extend like something that has weird composition or weird anatomy if it doesn't perturb my experience. As I said earlier, I like her manga because there is a cool story, characters I like, color illustrations that had nice color settings (not always but you know what I mean) etc. It's not perfect but there are other stronger points that activate the suspension of disbelief on my mind. Now, 30 years later, there is no more apologies.

It's totally fine for you to like this, really, but for people who know a bit about anatomy, composition, color theory, it's really painful to watch (and I'm not saying this to feel superior or anything).



May I repeat one more time this: criticizing =/= hate / toxicity.
And I don't understand, do you mean only people liking Takeuchi's art should post in this thread ? Maybe it should be renamed then ?
Except this not what we are discussing here?I was not discussing rather you have right to dislike the art.You do, my point your opinion was not more valid than anyone else.Downig others peoples opinions.

Also there is difference between criticism and bashing for the sake of bashing .Being negative for the sake of birnfg negative.Than acting like your opinions and views are facts.When in reality there no more valid than everyone else.Thats what's some of the fans in the forum are sick of.
 
Jul 6, 2012
692
1,909
1,665
Except this not what we are discussing here?I was not discussing rather you have right to dislike the art.You do, my point your opinion was not more valid than anyone else.Downig others peoples opinions.

Also there is difference between criticism and bashing for the sake of bashing .Being negative for the sake of birnfg negative.Than acting like your opinions and views are facts.When in reality there no more valid than everyone else.Thats what's some of the fans in the forum are sick of.
You are taking things way too personally. We are just explaining why in our views, it's bad art. Anatomy, composition or color theory isn't opinion, it's rules. Rules that can be broken, sure, but you have to learn them before breaking them and Naoko clearly doesn't master them.
One more time: pointing mistakes or bad things =/= hating.

And what do you mean "this is not what we are discussing here" ? Please refer to this thread first message by Memento: "How has her art evolved, how has it devolved, how has it stayed the same, etc".
 
Likes: Starlight
Aug 16, 2014
3,205
2,001
1,665
USA
You are taking things way too personally. We are just explaining why in our views, it's bad art. Anatomy, composition or color theory isn't opinion, it's rules. Rules that can be broken, sure, but you have to learn them before breaking them and Naoko clearly doesn't master them.
One more time: pointing mistakes or bad things =/= hating.

And what do you mean "this is not what we are discussing here" ? Please refer to this thread first message by Memento: "How has her art evolved, how has it devolved, how has it stayed the same, etc".
I was not commenting against why you disliked the art. I was replying to part lady pens comment.Who comment in her thing was."For those who find these pictures is beautiful? Do you know what composition in illustration means ?"'

"Of course you don't know Composition is.If you do you would not behind for personal taste."

That's what I was replying too.Thats what I mean by some fans get condescending and treating there own opinions as fact.
 
Last edited:

Memento

Systema Solare
Mar 8, 2012
5,984
7,601
1,665
underwatersphinx.blogspot.com
You are taking things way too personally. We are just explaining why in our views, it's bad art. Anatomy, composition or color theory isn't opinion, it's rules. Rules that can be broken, sure, but you have to learn them before breaking them and Naoko clearly doesn't master them.
Color theory is just that. Along with composition, it is very much a matter of opinion. Different people in different cultures in different art traditions at different points in time have had and will continue to have different notions about how to use color, or what constitutes good composition. Even with respect to anatomy, there's always going to be leeway when it comes to stylization. Acting like any aspect of art can be objectively and definitively critiqued is just... wrong.
 

Seira Hazuki

Solaris Luna
Jan 17, 2007
2,848
4,060
1,665
Honestly guys, the only solution is to just start putting people on ignore. I have done it and it's improved by forum experience a lot. Otherwise these topics are going to be constantly derailed because there is no serious moderation in this forum.

Also, at the end of day, a bunch of anonymous people on a forum might think Naoko is an abomination of an artist and they have every right to, but clearly she must be doing something right if a luxury brand like Chanel is featuring her art.