Was the Sailor Moon manga popular/influential enough to warrant Crystal?

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

Was the manga popular enough to warrant Crystal’s existence?

  • Yes

    Votes: 31 77.5%
  • No

    Votes: 9 22.5%

  • Total voters
    40
Jun 17, 2019
2,191
3,325
1,665
32
Rebeus is portrayed as the stereotypical bad male villain - showing pleasure in the suffering of the Senshis when they are captured, makes weird remarks at Esmeraude at times, shows a deranged face when he's injured on the face...
Yeah but he still has more of a personality than his counterpart in the 90’s anime ironically enough, who was made into just another Jadeite 2.0 and was absolutely abusive garbage to poor Koan.


The Amazon Trio are super weird in the manga - ridicule even; I have no idea why she did that to them. The sole reason they got a star casting and character song was because of their 90s anime version's popularity.
In the 90s anime, Hawk's Eye is a 'chara' (チャラ男) type of character, basically a shallow playboy who wears piercings or flashy clothes to look cool. Tiger's Eye is a lavish, dandy type of character, a frivolous and vain older man who likes to think he's popular with woman. Fish's Eye is an 男の娘 (basically a trap), he likes to cross-dress and likes men. And of course with all the sexual innuendos that comes with their schemes - that double penetration of Minako (-_-)...
You’re right about that, but I really doubt they’re meant to be gay men in the manga since Fish-Eye at least tries to kiss Ami. Most likely the “Okama” term that Naoko refers to them in her Materials Collection is meant to indicate they’re either trans or cross-dressers. (Which Hawks-Eye pretty much does in the manga)


Except this is a relationship of 2 of the main characters we've talking about - there needs to be ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT for it to be natural to the story and pertinent.
All the symbolism goes down the drain if it's not written properly. It's not a cool or quirky fluff anecdote like Michiru disliking sea cucumbers because it sounds funny to say it or Setsuna disliking cockroaches but never actually implementing these elements into the story.
All of these additional info had already been jotted down when designing the character - when creating a character, a mangaka is given a spreadsheet to fill in which includes all of the personal data of the said-character ranging from height/weight to likes/dislikes or blood-type/astrological sign. In the grand scheme of things, Ares and Aphrodite being lovers doesn't mean much unless Takeuchi explicitly references the myth in her story with referencing to the bonds of Rei and Minako.
ReiMina has as much logic as the random couples Kishimoto pumped out at the end of Naruto with zero building up to it in the story.
Eh to be fair their relationship is somewhat developed in that one Exam Battle side story where Minako goes to Rei’s school for a day, it’s not much but it’s something. But I agree that if you haven’t read the side-stories their relationship does come out of nowhere in Stars.


I don't think that means anything - Mimette is essentially the living definition of what everything Minako aspires to - a teenage successful idol with a cute figure and voice, wearing cute clothes and adored by her peers of her age group. She's basically fangirling hard.
Being paralleled with Haruka is simply because she's the leader of the Inners, just like Haruka is regarded as the leader of the Outers.
Except again she does also blush over Rei during their Exam Battle chapter, and while you’re right that she’s mostly paralleled with Haruka in terms of them both being the leaders of their respective teams I believe she’s also paralleled with her in terms of feelings for Usagi. Many times Minako thinks of Usagi as “her most important person,” she’s frequently portrayed as her knight in shining armor and is the Senshi that gets the most shipping subtext with her in the manga outside of Haruka and Seiya. (Rei comes right after ironically enough due to Usagi immediately crushing on her during her introduction chapter and that “Mars making a vow of chastity to Princess Serenity thing”, even though Reisagi is more of a thing in the 90’s anime)

Naoko also drew this illustration of Usagi and Mina…





Taking all this in tandem together with the Mimette thing I would say it’s not a stretch to interpret Manga Minako as bi. And while the Reinako ship might seem poorly developed in the manga, don’t forget that they’re also a thing in PGSM (which Naoko was said to have heavy involvement in) and much better developed there too I might add.


I think the answer to this question is extremely simple, YES, Sailor Moon is a financially successful show NOT domestically but internationally.
Everyone already knows this, the question is was it mostly because of the 90’s anime or did the manga also contribute to it’s fame and notoriety in any significant way?

This is incorrect. The anime was never ahead of the manga.
Was that not why the Makai Tree filler arc was created though? To give Naoko a chance to catch up to the anime and create the next arc?


Also, the anime didn't make any of her male villains queer other than Kunzite and Zoisite.
Saphir and Demande say hi. (Very much debatable with Demande true but he’s at the very least coded as bi with this scene right here:
)

Also I would argue Fish-Eye was made queer too, made a queer male at least. Considering they’re shown trying to kiss Ami while Tigers-Eye goes for Rei and Hawks-Eye is straight up crossdressing in the manga I suspect the “Okama” term Naoko uses to refer to them is meant to imply they’re trans (either transvestites or actual trans people) rather than gay/bi men.


What the hell are you even talking about? The panel of Zoisite and Kunzite sitting close together has never been removed from the manga. Where on earth did you come up with the idea that it was ever taken out?????????
I meant it was taken out in Crystal, not the manga. Sorry if that wasn’t made clear.


What grabbed my attention is her considering Anime Haruka & Michiru as shallow characters when actually they are richer than the inconsistent Manga Haruka and the candle holder Manga Michiru. After reading such statement I concluded this woman don't understand what a character development means.
She’s seriously said this? Source please? That’s rich considering Haruka in the manga only exists to be shipping bait for Usagi and Michiru is barely even a character.
 
Last edited:
Likes: Akari @ria

Starlight

Aurorae Lunares
May 31, 2009
1,466
1,975
1,665
Tankei Kingdom, Kinmoku
What grabbed my attention is her considering Anime Haruka & Michiru as shallow characters when actually they are richer than the inconsistent Manga Haruka and the candle holder Manga Michiru. After reading such statement I concluded this woman don't understand what a character development means.
Wow, I knew characterization was not her strong suit as a writer, but this comment makes it seem she is incapable of grasping what makes a character good even as a viewer. Yikes.
 

Lady Pen

Aurorae Lunares
Mar 12, 2021
1,584
5,423
1,665
She’s seriously said this? Source please? That’s rich considering Haruka in the manga only exists to be shipping bait for Usagi and Michiru is barely even a character.
It's in the same post I wrote:

One thing that surprises me is what she wrote in volume 12 (Tankouban set - first edition of the manga):

"This is the four part of Sailor Moon so far. Many people is asking: Where's Uranus? Where's Neptune? Will they not appear anymore? Those new Senshis became very popular (However in the Anime Sailor Moon S they were treated superficially. It made me sad. Sniff!!)
I entrust the Anime adaptation to an expert team, but sometimes I feel upset for the things I see.... but it seems everyone loves those Senshis. Ok. Fine. So do I.
I'd like to get some help for this four part. Sailor Moon is a long series (and it hasn't finished yet). And those new Senshis won't be forgotten. Be patient and keep reading the new volumes. Don't forget to watch Sailor Moon SuperS either..."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Concerning the antagonistic portrayal of HaruMichi in the 90s anime it's simple - it parallels the real-life Japanese office business hierarchy.
Basically the Inners are the 'common services' department, tasked with relatively average powers appointed to deal with threats from within the Solar System.
Uranus and Neptune are the 'upper management' department tasked with more powers and have a higher responsibility in guarding the Solar System from outsiders.
Pluto and Saturn the the 'special forces' department of sorts, allowed to only act during special circumstances, hence their very limited presence.
In real life, members of 2 different departments are not to share duties or even help each other on their tasks even if they are friends and seeing them struggling with their duty.
This is reflected into the great sense of duty and responsibility of UraNep calling the Inners immature as well as referencing to them as 'those kids' later on, taking on the burden of dealing with Galaxia and the Starlights as these threats fall directly onto their soldiers' responsibility and status.
Considering in the manga, this hierarchy is totally absent, I guess Naoko Takeuchi never understood what was being reflected into their antagonistic nature.
Soooo interesting. I never ever thought about such hierarchy before. Excellent point. Now Pluto and Saturn pseudo absence in Stars makes sense to me. Crikey!

Oh, I'd like to read an analytical essay of yours about SM. That'd be heaven. This is quality content. Are you writing all this kind of things on another site? If you do so, PM me please. ::love::

And ignore the members calling you names. You'll have realised that their lives depend on the reputation of Takeuchi's career as a manga artist and the Sailor Moon manga's biblical aura they've been spreading over the years. When someone take those things away they experience an existential vacuum.
 

Lady Pen

Aurorae Lunares
Mar 12, 2021
1,584
5,423
1,665
Wow, I knew characterization was not her strong suit as a writer, but this comment makes it seem she is incapable of grasping what makes a character good even as a viewer. Yikes.
I've realised that many fans haven't read the comments Naoko wrote in the tankoubans. If they had done that there wouldn't have been such a lack of information.

I understand many couldn't buy them back in the day or also most of the comments weren't translated in the 90's, and were omitted in some old editions.
 
Last edited:
Likes: Starlight

Masquerade

Solaris Luna
Nov 22, 2016
2,687
4,842
1,665
I've realised that many fans haven't read the comments Naoko wrote in the tankoubans. If they had done that there wouldn't have been such a lack of information.

I understand many couldn't buy them back in the day or also most of the comments weren't translated in the 90's, and were omitted in some old editions.
You should make a thread just for tankoban entries from Naoko. Not for the sake of good of bad, but it's the kind of information that's not that widespread.
 

NJ_

Gurges Ater
Oct 31, 2009
9,797
4,332
1,665
38
Wallington, NJ
Also push for it to be a sticky thread.

There's already one for those punch comics right? Sticky that too.
 

Memento

Stella Nova
Mar 8, 2012
6,126
8,140
1,665
underwatersphinx.blogspot.com
Revisiting the Tokyopop Manga

"Here is the fourth arc of Sailor Moon. I've heard a lot of people ask, "What about Uranus? And Neptune? Can't we see them [again]?" These new soldiers have really become very popular (yet in the TV version of Sailor Moon S (sic) they were just cast aside... I was very saddened, sniff!)."

Naoko accuses the anime of "casting aside" the Outers (she uses the word "poi," an adverb meaning "carelessly" or "lightly" and usually used to describe something being thrown). She says "Sailor Moon S," but based on context, she may have meant SuperS. In any case, her complaint is not that the anime's characterization of Uranus and Neptune was "superficial," but that she felt they weren't given enough love and attention, which is hardly a controversial opinion coming from the original author who is obviously going to be more protective and possessive over her characters, especially without the distance of time. But some people on this forum would have nothing to do if they couldn't manufacture outrage about Naoko.
 
Jun 17, 2019
2,191
3,325
1,665
32
Naoko accuses the anime of "casting aside" the Outers (she uses the word "poi," an adverb meaning "carelessly" or "lightly" and usually used to describe something being thrown). She says "Sailor Moon S," but based on context, she may have meant SuperS. In any case, her complaint is not that the anime's characterization of Uranus and Neptune was "superficial," but that she felt they weren't given enough love and attention, which is hardly a controversial opinion coming from the original author who is obviously going to be more protective and possessive over her characters, especially without the distance of time.
She must have meant SuperS then because it doesn’t make any sense to complain over Haruka and Michiru not getting enough attention in S when one of the chief complaints about S as a season was that it sidelined the Inners and the Outers took over the show.
 

Masquerade

Solaris Luna
Nov 22, 2016
2,687
4,842
1,665
Revisiting the Tokyopop Manga

"Here is the fourth arc of Sailor Moon. I've heard a lot of people ask, "What about Uranus? And Neptune? Can't we see them [again]?" These new soldiers have really become very popular (yet in the TV version of Sailor Moon S (sic) they were just cast aside... I was very saddened, sniff!)."

Naoko accuses the anime of "casting aside" the Outers (she uses the word "poi," an adverb meaning "carelessly" or "lightly" and usually used to describe something being thrown). She says "Sailor Moon S," but based on context, she may have meant SuperS. In any case, her complaint is not that the anime's characterization of Uranus and Neptune was "superficial," but that she felt they weren't given enough love and attention, which is hardly a controversial opinion coming from the original author who is obviously going to be more protective and possessive over her characters, especially without the distance of time. But some people on this forum would have nothing to do if they couldn't manufacture outrage about Naoko.
If she wrote Sailor Moon S, the one doing the translation and putting (sic) after S because a uperS may be missing is the quote manufacturer. :lol:
 

Lady Pen

Aurorae Lunares
Mar 12, 2021
1,584
5,423
1,665
You should make a thread just for tankoban entries from Naoko. Not for the sake of good of bad, but it's the kind of information that's not that widespread.
I'd like to. I got the old 18 volumes + old 3 volumes of Sailor V from Mandarake. She talks about Sera Myu influencing on the manga, for example and a lot of interesting things.

By the way, I'm gonna PM you. I have the video I promised. I won't post it on the forum because the Norma's editor in chief has social media. Someone could attack her.... calling her names.....

It's the video when Norma couldn't release volume 4 (Jupiter's cover) of the manga, because of the lack of organisation of you-know-who for approving different references.
 

Masquerade

Solaris Luna
Nov 22, 2016
2,687
4,842
1,665
I'd like to. I got the old 18 volumes + old 3 volumes of Sailor V from Mandarake. She talks about Sera Myu influencing on the manga, for example and a lot of interesting things.

By the way, I'm gonna PM you. I have the video I promised. I won't post it on the forum because the Norma's editor in chief has social media. Someone could attack her.... calling her names.....

It's the video when Norma couldn't release volume 4 (Jupiter's cover) of the manga, because of the lack of organisation of you-know-who for approving different references.
OMG... The face she makes when she talks about Jupiter's "wood green"... Talk about a tired woman :lol:
She says CLAMP is also difficult in that regard, which I also expected. But I never heard of Cardcaptor Sakura manga volumes taking 4/5 years to get approval in smaller markets. Actually, Sakura was one of the first popular manga titles in Brazil. I have the complete Deluxe edition on my shelf.
Our Princess-hime is unbeatable when it comes to disrespect towards foreign companies and the audience!
 
Last edited:

kasumigenx

Systema Solare
Feb 8, 2021
5,388
2,834
1,665
36
www.deviantart.com
OMG... The face she makes when she talks about Jupiter's "wood green"... Talk about a tired woman :lol:
She says CLAMP is also difficult in that regard, which I also expected. But I never heard of Cardcaptor Sakura manga volumes taking 4/5 years to get approval in smaller markets. Actually, Sakura was one of the first popular manga titles in Brazil. I have the complete Deluxe edition on my shelf.
Our Princess-hime is unbeatable when it comes to disrespect towards foreign companies and the audience!
At least CLAMP is open to changes in cover images or creating another edition for another country.
 
Likes: Masquerade

Akari @ria

Lumen Cinererum
Jun 17, 2017
386
639
665
All of the problems that Naoko faced you're cited - ALL mangakas go through them!

Shounen Jump is notoriously known in the industry to be a hell to be dealt with for mangakas because they are given very little say or leeway once their series kick in - Tite Kubo has continuously lamented on that, even going as far as to advice aspiring mangakas to not listen to their editor.
Aspiring mangakas are even advised in manga vocational schools to not target Shounen Jump if they want a minimum freedom in their work.
The more popular your work gets and the bigger the publishing house you're working at is, the lesser writing freedom you have.

Sailor Moon was a collaboration because of Toei - of course, there was going to be things she couldn't do that at times that either Kondasha, Toei or Bandai would refuse to - that's how the industry works.
She frequently complains about the 90s anime and Toei but also forgets to mention Kondasha envisioned only a single story arc and it was because the 90s anime that Toei along with Kondasha asked her to continue.
Everything she has is because Toei saw the potential in the pitch of her work - unlike other mangakas who have to work hard and harder to not be cancelled by the publisher at each weekly/monthly ratings results.
If Toei didn't saw the potential in her work, made not the anime immediately, hadn't the anime been successful enough, her manga would have ended by the Dark Kingdom arc (like she along with Kondasha planned to during the early stages as shoujo mangas typically had a 4-5 tankobon run at most ).

An editor's job is to review the storyboard of his mangaka, discuss the story proceedings (being the bridge between the mangaka and the publishing house), everything ranging from story, characters, color design or even the logo of the series HAS to be approved by the editor who himself has to get the approval of the publishers, has regular meetings with the mangaka, at times might check how the inking phase is going and is the one who normally is handed the manuscript to.
It's not like once a manga gets green-lit, the mangaka is allowed to do whatever they want - EVERYTHING has to be approved by the publishing house hence why there are regular meetings between mangaka and editors.

Naoko Takeuchi wasn't the only one who had to face rejection - ALL mangakas do - be it veterans, successful or aspiring mangakas.
Unless you go Nao Yazawa's way and self-publish your work, there's no going round it.

As far as Naoko Takeuchi helping her husband, Wikipedia mentions she bailed on him because working as an assistant and tankobon manager (which would require frequent meetings with the publisher) was too much for her - she was given the work of screentoning - meaning she had to just cut and glue paper over the drawings but it was too much work for her so she left...

The anime production industry is very different and works very differently as well than the manga industry. She can't just come into the studio demanding that everything from the animators, music, story choices made are all to be approved by her - she's a mangaka, that's not her job.
Going as far as Kon who found the Guardian Mascot scene and Sailor Princesses to be ridiculous to be transcribed 1:1 and lamented on it, yet wasn't allowed to change it - Chiaki Kon is the director not Naoko Takeuchi - she should let people who know their jobs do their jobs.

In contrast, the late Kazuki Takahashi who was involved in the Yu-Gi-Oh! Darkside of Dimensions movie production and supervised the story not only provided art for the series production but went as far as well as drawing the key frames for one scene of the movie. He didn't come and made demands to be followed after him but instead contributed to what he could to add his touch to the movie and worked in a positive atmosphere with the anime staff.
I'm well aware of it, I'm sorry that, also considering the comments mentioned and present in the Tankobons, Naoko has imposed herself in this way on the production of the 90s anime.
As an emerging mangaka with the first success story, she should have been more humble, grit her teeth and wait for the times when she could have had her say.

However, as a fan of the manga, I would have really appreciated a different animated work and approach rather than settling for Crystal/eternal/cosmos.

I don't swallow how, even if Naoko is behind the supervision, such a poor quality product came out, for this reason I often doubt that she is actually behind everything, checking every detail, I would not have released a product of the gender neither on TV and cinema screens nor on the market or on the internet.

A style that has nothing to do with her one, disproportionate and sometimes inexpressive characters, often wooden and slow animations that leave nothing to empathy ...

Just for the sake of necessarily doing as she wants? However, something doesn't add up to me.

I don't know anything about PQ Angels. IF PQ Angels had been successful, Toei might have been interested in it but since it was an original Takeuchi work, it barely had any chapters and any marketability in merchandising (compared to Sailor Moon or Saint Seiya), it's highly unlikely Toei was watching PQ Angels from afar.
There's a weird mention of Wikipedia that Takeuchi says Toei had the manuscripts which makes no sense - they're an animation studio, they have nothing to do with manga manuscripts. If they were envisaging a possible anime, they would have been talking with Kondasha, possible sponsors such as Bandai and TV stations, scouting for possible character designers... They have no business in having the manuscripts, at best composition drafts of Takeuchi and that's still a stretch.
In the manga published in Italy for the first time there was a space dedicated to manga and anime reviews, where they mentioned how pq angels was already in Toei's interest to make it into an anime. I don't know if it was always just a rumor or not.
If I remember correctly the Japanese wikipedia explains how toei is in possession of a copy of the manuscripts.

An actual spin-off novel could have been about Nehelenia or Princess Serenity during the Silver Millennium era, interacting with the Inners and her mother, fleshing out their relationship and detailing the first encounter of Serenity and Endymion.
It would be nice if Naoko filled those gaps that the few info contained in the manga leave us...
 
Likes: Masquerade

Talentless Fool

Aurorae Lunares
Jan 23, 2023
1,449
6,144
1,665
I'm well aware of it, I'm sorry that, also considering the comments mentioned and present in the Tankobons, Naoko has imposed herself in this way on the production of the 90s anime.
As an emerging mangaka with the first success story, she should have been more humble, grit her teeth and wait for the times when she could have had her say.

However, as a fan of the manga, I would have really appreciated a different animated work and approach rather than settling for Crystal/eternal/cosmos.

I don't swallow how, even if Naoko is behind the supervision, such a poor quality product came out, for this reason I often doubt that she is actually behind everything, checking every detail, I would not have released a product of the gender neither on TV and cinema screens nor on the market or on the internet.

A style that has nothing to do with her one, disproportionate and sometimes inexpressive characters, often wooden and slow animations that leave nothing to empathy ...

Just for the sake of necessarily doing as she wants? However, something doesn't add up to me.
I remember that when Crystal was announced, there were rumors that Toei wanted to do a Precure-style reboot after the success of Saint Seiya Omega and was not interested in a manga-anime version and thus butted heads constantly with Takeuchi.

It was also reported that Sakou was surprised that she passed her interview and was taken as character designer because she believed she flunked said interview.
Character Designer interviews generally require the interviewee to come prepared with a portfolio of samples and is required on the spot to change, modify details or even can be asked to do a sample character on the spot. Yoshihiko Umakoshi, who was appointed as the Character Designer of Omega by Toei, had to go through this process.

As well as the overall poor polish of Sakou's settei art, the disastrous quality control over the Blu-Ray covers art - no it's not because they have 'Naoko Takeuchi-style' body language but actual problems; Jupiter has gigantic boobs for her body, Venus while anatomically is correct has been going to the gym with thick biceps and thighs that belong to Jupiter, the Black Lady cover is an anatomical mess, the last cover has a blatant error with only the Usagi/Mamoru and Neo Serenity/Endymion cover actually good.
All of that shows us a clear lack of quality control and interest over the product by Toei.

Crystal 3 had more care put into it but around half-way through the anime run every traffic and promotion around the product suddenly stopped.
It's clear by the ending that Toei was envisaging a TV sequel 1 year or 1 &1/2 year later.
But then Eternal went into a limbo for around a year with Takeuchi as supervisor.
While a lot of elements of the 90s were kept (henshins, stock attacks, character design), the story was a 1:1 - with not enough funds put into it and Usagi's (Takeuchi's favorite) being the ugly duck for the stocks (and by the looks of it, this hasn't changed in Cosmos) and even subtly slipping an Itoh-like Chibi Chibi shot in the Cosmos trailer - again signs that the relationship between Toei and Takeuchi is very sour.
Moreover, I can only suppose how much Takeuchi fell from high because the goods from Tadano's design were a success (moreso than the 2 movies as Toei mentions in its report), showing us that the Japanese public is more interested into the 90s anime than a possible anime adaptation of the manga.

Honestly, Takeuchi should have gone Kurumada's way - made a deal with Toei = they would be allowed to make their Precure reboot series to test the waters for the chances of a possible anime revival as grand as back in the 90s (which would have guaranteed us a year-long series from average to good overall quality for atleast 2 and a half years as they would have gone to adapt till Infinity to have the full Outer roster), while she would be promised to have an anime version of her work spanning over 10 years (a la Jojo anime) spanning through different medias such as TV series, Netflix premiering series and ending into a movie trilogy - just imagine if we would have had Aimer as the lead singer for the theme songs like she did for the Heaven's Feel trilogy - for Stars (while actively participating in adding story details to flesh out everything).
And who knows perhaps for the 30th anniversary, Toei could have made a sequel movie to the 90s anime with the original seiyuus reprising their roles. They did do it after all for Doremi and it was a much better financial success than Eternal and won Best Animation Film Award and was even screened in select overseas theatres.

If Takeuchi was indeed the mastermind of a behemoth business manager that people claim she is, she would have done something along those lines which would have:-
1) Allowed Sailor Moon to get a true revival as an anime series (more so needed since compared to Saint Seiya, Digimon or Precure, it doesn't have an endless reboot marketability; I doubt anyone would be interested in watching the adventures of Sailor Callisto or Sailor Thalassa...)
2) She would have finally had her desired good quality anime adaptation.
3) The anime series would still have a future.

But no and unlike for other anime series, I have never seen anyone enthusiastic on the anime staff. Only poor Kon was excited to work on it for Crystal 3. Sailor Moon Crystermos has had the right holders butt heads over creative decisions so much that everyone in the anime staff seems to want to get over it as quickly as possible and move on.


In the manga published in Italy for the first time there was a space dedicated to manga and anime reviews, where they mentioned how pq angels was already in Toei's interest to make it into an anime. I don't know if it was always just a rumor or not.
If I remember correctly the Japanese wikipedia explains how toei is in possession of a copy of the manuscripts.
I checked the PQ Angels JP wikipedia page and no such thing is mentioned.
It only says that due to lack of fan letters (so I guess poor reception) and following an incident involving the loss of manuscripts, the serialization was terminated.
 
Last edited:

Yamoon

Aurorae Lunares
Jul 17, 2006
1,062
1,166
1,665
41
If Takeuchi was indeed the mastermind of a behemoth business manager that people claim she is, she would have done something along those lines which would have:-
1) Allowed Sailor Moon to get a true revival as an anime series (more so needed since compared to Saint Seiya, Digimon or Precure, it doesn't have an endless reboot marketability; I doubt anyone would be interested in watching the adventures of Sailor Callisto or Sailor Thalassa...)
2) She would have finally had her desired good quality anime adaptation.
3) The anime series would still have a future..
I'm pretty sure that she's billionaire and don't need your precious advices to remain rich :lol: but thanks for them anyway:artemis: :wave::luna:
 

Akari @ria

Lumen Cinererum
Jun 17, 2017
386
639
665
sorry, i omitted a detail, i was referring to naoko's wikipedia page, but it seems i remember badly because i double checked and there is no reference there to the fact that toei was already involved in the pq angels project.
 

kasumigenx

Systema Solare
Feb 8, 2021
5,388
2,834
1,665
36
www.deviantart.com
I remember that
And who knows perhaps for the 30th anniversary, Toei could have made a sequel movie to the 90s anime with the original seiyuus reprising their roles. They did do it after all for Doremi and it was a much better financial success than Eternal and won Best Animation Film Award and was even screened in select overseas theatres.
TOEI should do a sequel to the 90s anime since that is what the japanese fans want.